Aizer, Early, Eli, Imbens, Lee, Lleras-Muney, and Strand (2024) estimate the impact of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), a large-scale youth training program implemented by the US federal government between 1933 and 1942. Eligible young men (ages 17 to 23) enlisted voluntarily and were sent to work camps in rural areas for 6-month periods, where they performed various forms of manual labor. In exchange, the program provided a weekly wage, housing, food, and access to medical treatment, along with academic and vocational courses.
The authors construct a dataset to track long-term beneficiary outcomes by merging individual-level data on participants from Colorado and New Mexico to Census data, WWII enlistment records, Social Security data and individual death records. It then exploits variation in the length of program participation to evaluate the program’s impacts. The main findings are that enrollees who spent more time in CCC training grew taller, lived longer lives and — despite not having significantly higher earnings in the short-run — had significantly higher long-run earnings. The authors also find modest increases in participants’ educational attainment and increases in short-term geographic mobility.
MVPF = 6.0
The authors present seven main components of net program costs (all final values noted in 2017 dollars).
(1) Upfront cost of the program (wages, food, lodging, and training). The authors obtain an estimate this cost from Levine 2010, who estimated the annual cost per enrollee to be $1,004 in 1939. Adjusting for inflation and considering that the average enrollee in their sample spends 0.8 years in the program, the average cost per enrollee is $14,384.81.
(2) A negative fiscal externality due to increased Social Security transfers, given that the program increases life expectancy and pension payments. The authors compute the additional survival rate caused by program participation for each year after age 65, assumed to be the age of retirement. Using the finding that enrollees receive on average an extra $14 in pension payments per month, the authors compute a net present value of total extra pension expenditures due to program participation of $2,514.17.
(3) A positive fiscal externality from the higher amount of taxes paid from participants’ increased earnings. The authors first estimate the extra earnings due to program participation from observed increases in pension contributions. It then assumes a 33.6% average tax rate, based on the CBO tax simulator, and computes the taxes paid on extra earnings due to program participation to be $6,965.46.
(4) A positive fiscal externality from decrease in social security disability (SSDI) payout due to decrease in claiming rate. The authors estimate a baseline value of SSDI claiming using the average SSDI amount (1,171.80) at the average claiming age (50), and the average claiming rate in their sample (0.21). They compute the net present value of lifetime payout, then compare with value with the change in SSDI amounts by accounting for the decrease in SSDI claiming rate, yielding a value of $910.61.
(5) A positive fiscal externality from decrease in social security payout from increase in retirement age. The authors use their average enrollee’s increase in claiming age (0.33) and assume that this increase affects the retirement decision with probability (1-0.21). They multiply 0.33 * (1-0.21) by the average amount an enrollee would receive at age 65, yielding $732.51.
(6) A positive fiscal externality from decrease in SSDI payout due to increase in claiming age. The authors use their average enrollee’s increase in claiming age (0.33) and assume that this increase affects the retirement decision with probability 0.21 (the average rate of disability claiming in their sample). They multiply 0.33 * 0.21 by the average amount an enrollee would receive at age 51, yielding $72.61.
(7) A positive fiscal externality from goods produced during the program (primarily conservations work. The authors do not estimate the total value of the conservation work and note that their net cost should then be considered an upper bound.
Adding the first six components yields a net cost of $8,217.78.
The authors note four components of the willingness-to-pay:
(1) The value of the increase in longevity. The authors compute the total increase in survival rate due to program participation and multiply it by the value of a statistical life of $150,000, yielding a WTP of $25,456.40.
(2) The increase in earnings. The authors use the after-tax portion of the present value of the earnings increase, equal to $13,642.41.
(3) The real wage when enrolled. The authors use the average monthly transfers of $66.25 per enrollee (including $30 in direct wages, plus expenditure on transportation, food, and lodging) and multiply it by the average program duration, getting a total of $11,390.36.
(4) The decrease in benefit from the loss of SSDI due to lower claiming rates. This is equivalent to component (4) of the costs and is equal to -$910.61.
The total WTP for program participation is the sum of these four components: $49,578.56.
Combining the WTP and net cost, the MVPF is then $49,578.56/$8,217.78 = 6.03. The authors note that, if they exclude the WTP for the increase in longevity from the numerator, the MVPF is 2.52.
Aizer, Anna, Nancy Early, Shari Eli, Guido Imbens, Keyoung Lee, Adriana Lleras-Muney, and Alexander Strand (2024). “The Lifetime Impacts of the New Deal’s Youth Employment Program.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae016
Levine, Linda (2010). “Job Creation Programs of the Great Depression: the WPA and the CCC.” Congressional Research Service 7-5700.
https://ecommons.cornell.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1813/77652/4FA75101d01.pdf